4.6 Article

Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 22, Pages 6918-6923

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.6918

Keywords

Helicobacter pylori; Immune thrombocytopenic purpura; Platelet counts

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM: To assess the effect of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication on platelet counts in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (cITP). METHODS: A total of 36 cITP patients were included in the study. The diagnosis of H. pylori was done by rapid urease test and Giemsa staining of the gastric biopsy specimen. All H. pylori positive patients received standard triple therapy for 14 d and were subjected for repeat endoscopy at 6 wk. Patients who continued to be positive for H. pylori on second endoscopy received second line salvage therapy. All the patients were assessed for platelet response at 6 wk, 3rd and 6th months. RESULTS: Of the 36 patients, 17 were positive for H. pylori infection and eradication was achieved in 16 patients. The mean baseline platelet count in the eradicated patients was 88615.38 (+/-) 30117.93/mm(3) and platelet count after eradication at 6 wk, 3 mo and 6 mo was 143230.77 +/- 52437.51/mm(3) (p = 0.003), 152562.50 +/- 52892.3/mm(3) (p = 0.0001), 150187.50 +/- 41796.68/mm(3) (p = 0.0001) respectively and in the negative patients, the mean baseline count was 71000.00 +/- 33216.46/mm(3) and at 6 wk, 3rd and 6th month follow up was 137631.58 +/- 74364.13/mm(3) (p = 0.001), 125578.95 +/- 71472.1/mm(3) (p = 0.005), 77210.53 +/- 56892.28/mm(3) (p = 0.684) respectively. CONCLUSION: Eradication of H. pylori leads to increase in platelet counts in patients with cITP and can be recommended as a complementary treatment with conventional therapy. (C) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available