4.6 Article

Overexpression of kallikrein gene 10 is a biomarker for predicting poor prognosis in gastric cancer

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 48, Pages 9425-9431

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9425

Keywords

Kallikrein gene 10; Gastric cancer; Survival analysis; Prognostic biomarkers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM: To analyze the expression of kallikrein gene 10 (KLK10) in gastric cancer and to determine whether KLK10 has independent prognostic value in gastric cancer. METHODS: We studied KLK10 expression in 80 histologically confirmed gastric cancer samples using real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and hK10 expression using immunohistochemistry. Correlations with clinicopathological variables (lymph node metastasis, depth of invasion and histology) and with outcomes (disease-free survival and overall survival) during a median follow-up period of 31 mo were assessed. Gastric cancer tissues were then classified as KLK10 positive or negative. RESULTS: KLK10 was found to be highly expressed in 57/80 (70%) of gastric cancer samples, while its expression was very low in normal gastric tissues. Positive relationships between KLK10 expression and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.048), depth of invasion (P = 0.034) and histology (P = 0.015) were observed. Univariate survival analysis revealed that gastric cancer patients with positive KLK10 expression had an increased risk for relapse/metastasis and death (P = 0.005 and 0.002, respectively). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that KLK10 was an independent prognostic indicator of disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with gastric cancer. CONCLUSION: KLK10 expression is an independent biomarker of unfavorable prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. (C) 2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available