4.6 Review

Thinking outside the liver: Induced pluripotent stem cells for hepatic applications

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages 3385-3396

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i22.3385

Keywords

Liver stem cells; Hepatocytes; Disease modeling; Drug toxicity; Clinical applications; Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocytes

Funding

  1. Asian Healthcare Foundation, Hyderabad, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) unraveled a mystery in stem cell research, after identification of four re-programming factors for generating pluripotent stem cells without the need of embryos. This breakthrough in generating iPSCs from somatic cells has overcome the ethical issues and immune rejection involved in the use of human embryonic stem cells. Hence, iPSCs form a great potential source for developing disease models, drug toxicity screening and cell-based therapies. These cells have the potential to differentiate into desired cell types, including hepatocytes, under in vitro as well as under in vivo conditions given the proper microenvironment. iPSC-derived hepatocytes could be useful as an unlimited source, which can be utilized in disease modeling, drug toxicity testing and producing autologous cell therapies that would avoid immune rejection and enable correction of gene defects prior to cell transplantation. In this review, we discuss the induction methods, role of reprogramming factors, and characterization of iPSCs, along with hepatocyte differentiation from iPSCs and potential applications. Further, we discuss the location and detection of liver stem cells and their role in liver regeneration. Although tumor formation and genetic mutations are a cause of concern, iPSCs still form a promising source for clinical applications. (c) 2013 Baishideng. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available