4.6 Article

Identification of patients at-risk for Lynch syndrome in a hospital-based colorectal surgery clinic

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 766-773

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i6.766

Keywords

Colorectal cancer; Family history; Hereditary cancer; Lynch syndrome; Microsatellite instability phenotype

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS)
  3. Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Ciencias Gastroenterologicas (UFRGS)
  4. Fundacao de Incentivo a Pesquisa do Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (FIPe-HCPA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM: To determine the prevalence of a family history suggestive of Lynch syndrome (LS) among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) followed in a coloproctology outpatient clinic in Southern Brazil. METHODS: A consecutive sample of patients with CRC were interviewed regarding personal and family histories of cancer. Clinical data and pathology features of the tumor were obtained from chart review. RESULTS: Of the 212 CRC patients recruited, 61(29%) reported a family history of CRC, 45 (21.2%) were diagnosed under age 50 years and 11 (5.2%) had more than one primary CRC. Family histories consistent with Amsterdam and revised Bethesda criteria for LS were identified in 22 (10.4%) and 100 (47.2%) patients, respectively. Twenty percent of the colorectal tumors had features of the high microsatellite instability phenotype, which was associated with younger age at CRC diagnosis and with Bethesda criteria (P < 0.001). Only 5.3% of the patients above age 50 years had been previously submitted for CRC screening and only 4% of patients with suspected LS were referred for genetic risk assessment. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients with CRC were at high risk for LS. Education and training of health care professionals are essential to ensure proper management. (C) 2011 Baishideng. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available