4.6 Article

Natural taurine promotes apoptosis of human hepatic stellate cells in proteomics analysis

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 15, Pages 1916-1923

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i15.1916

Keywords

Natural taurine; Proteomics; Hepatic stellate cell; Hepatic fibrosis; Apoptosis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30660235]
  2. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [0728080]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM: To study the differential expression of proteins between natural taurine treated hepatic stellate cells and controls, and investigate the underlying regulatory mechanism of natural taurine in inhibiting hepatic fibrosis. METHODS: A proteomic strategy combining two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-MS/MS) was used to study the differential expression of proteins and Western blotting was used to validate the results. Gene ontology (GO) method was utilized to analyze the functional enrichment of differentially expressed proteins. Flow cytometry was performed to compare the apoptosis rate between taurine-treated and untreated hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). RESULTS: Nineteen differentially expressed proteins (11 up-regulated and 8 down-regulated) were identified by 2D/MS, and the expression profiles of GLO1 and ANXA1 were validated by Western blotting. GO analysis found that these differentially expressed proteins were enriched within biological processes such as cellular apoptosis, oxidation reaction and metabolic process in clusters. Flow cytometric analysis showed that taurine-treated HSCs had a significantly increased apoptosis rate when compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: Natural taurine can promote HSC apoptosis so as to inhibit hepatic fibrosis. (C) 2010 Baishideng. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available