4.6 Article

Serum neopterin levels in children with hepatitis-B-related chronic liver disease and its relationship to disease severity

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 44, Pages 6840-6843

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.6840

Keywords

Hepatitis B; Chronic liver disease; Serum neopterin; Histological grade; Children

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM: To evaluate serum neopterin levels and their correlations with liver function tests and histological grade in children with hepatitis-B-related chronic liver disease. METHODS: The study population comprised 48 patients with chronic active hepatitis B, 32 patients with hepatitis-B-related active liver cirrhosis and 40 normal controls. Serum neopterin was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD serum neopterin levels were 14.2 +/- 5.6 nmol/L in patients with chronic hepatitis, 20.3 +/- 7.9 nmol/L in patients with liver cirrhosis and 5.2 +/- 1.4 nmol/L in control group. Serum neopterin levels were significantly higher in patients with chronic hepatitis (P = 0.005) and cirrhosis patients (P = 0.008), than in control subjects. Cirrhotic patients had significantly higher serum neopterin levels than patients with chronic hepatitis (P = 0.004). There was a positive correlation between serum neopterin levels and alanine aminotransferase levels in patients with chronic hepatitis (r = 0.41, P = 0.004) and cirrhotic patients (r = 0.39, P = 0.005). Positive correlations were detected between serum neopterin levels and inflammatory score in patients with chronic hepatitis (r = 0.51, P = 0.003) and cirrhotic patients (r = 0.49, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that serum neopterin levels can be considered as a marker of inflammatory activity and severity of disease in children with hepatitis-B-related chronic liver disease. (C) 2008 The WIG Press. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available