4.6 Article

Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in determining treatment efficacy and outcome after pancreatic cancer chemotherapy

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 47, Pages 7183-7191

Publisher

W J G PRESS
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.7183

Keywords

Pancreatic cancer; Chemotherapy; Gemcitabine; Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; Outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM: To investigate if contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CE-US) is useful for determining treatment efficacy and outcome in the early stages of pancreatic cancer chemotherapy by assessing changes in intratumor hemodynamics using CE-US with a contrast agent. METHODS: The subjects were 34 patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer treated by chemotherapy. CE-US was assessed after every treatment (course) completion under the same conditions, and patients were divided into two groups according to the intratumor enhancement pattern: Vascular rich (R) group and vascular poor (P) group. RESULTS: After the second course of treatment, R group in intratumor hemodynamics had 18 patients, and P group had 16 patients. The reduction rates of serum CA19-9 level after chemotherapy which decreased to half or less of the baseline level were 2/15 (0.1%) in P group, but 11/16 (69%) in R group (P = 0.006). When the mean number of courses of chemotherapy and outcome were compared, P group had a mean number of courses of 4.9 (R group, 10.2) and mean survival time (MST) of 246 d (R group, 402 d), showing that outcome was significantly better in R group (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: CE-US revealed that the change in intratumor blood flow correlated with both serum CA19-9 level and outcome. Patients with serum CA19-9 that decreased to less than half the baseline level, and patients with an abundant intratumor blood flow, had a significantly better outcome. Thus, CE-US is potentially useful for evaluating treatment efficacy and outcome in the early stages of pancreatic cancer chemotherapy. (C) 2008 The WJG Press. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available