4.7 Article

An Improved Polynomial Neural Network Classifier Using Real-Coded Genetic Algorithm

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS
Volume 45, Issue 11, Pages 1389-1401

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2015.2406855

Keywords

Genetic algorithm (GA); group methods of data handling (GMDH); pattern classification; polynomial neural network (PNN)

Funding

  1. University System of Taiwan-University of California, San Diego (UST-UCSD) International Center of Excellence in Advanced Bio-Engineering through the Taiwan National Science Council I-RICE Program [MOST 103-2911-I-009-101, MOST 103-2627-E-009-001]
  2. Aiming for the Top University Plan [104W963]
  3. Army Research Laboratory [W911NF-10-2-0022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a novel approach is proposed to improve the classification performance of a polynomial neural network (PNN). In this approach, the partial descriptions (PDs) are generated at the first layer based on all possible combinations of two features of the training input patterns of a dataset. The set of PDs from the first layer, the set of all input features, and a bias constitute the chromosome of the real-coded genetic algorithm (RCGA). A system of equations is solved to determine the values of the real coefficients of each chromosome of the RCGA for the training dataset with the mean classification accuracy (CA) as the fitness value of each chromosome. To adjust these values for unknown testing patterns, the RCGA is iterated in the usual manner using simple selection, crossover, mutation, and elitist selection. The method is tested extensively with the University of California, Irvine benchmark datasets by utilizing tenfold cross validation of each dataset, and the performance is compared with various well-known state-of-the-art techniques. The results obtained from the proposed method in terms of CA are superior and outperform other known methods on various datasets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available