4.2 Article

DFR: an efficient directional flooding-based routing protocol in underwater sensor networks

Journal

WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS & MOBILE COMPUTING
Volume 12, Issue 17, Pages 1517-1527

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/wcm.1079

Keywords

underwater sensor networks; routing protocol; directional flooding

Funding

  1. Defense Acquisition Program Administration
  2. Agency for Defense Development [UD100002KD]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unlike terrestrial sensor networks, underwater sensor networks (UWSNs) have salient features such as a long propagation delay, narrow bandwidth, and high packet loss over links. Hence, path setup-based routing protocols proposed for terrestrial sensor networks are not applicable because a large latency of the path establishment is observed, and packet delivery is not reliable in UWSNs. Even though routing protocols such as VBF (vector based forwarding) and HHVBF (hop-by-hop VBF) were introduced for UWSNs, their performance in terms of reliability deteriorates at high packet loss. In this paper, we therefore propose a directional flooding-based routing protocol, called DFR, in order to achieve reliable packet delivery. DFR performs a so-called controlled flooding, where DFR changes the number of nodes which participate in forwarding a packet according to their link quality. When a forwarding node has poor link quality to its neighbor nodes geographically advancing toward the sink, DFR allows more nodes to participate in forwarding the packet. Otherwise, a few nodes are enough to forward the packet reliably. In addition, we identify two types of void problems which can occur during the controlled flooding and introduce their corresponding solutions. Our simulation study using ns-2 simulator proves that DFR is more suitable for UWSNs, especially when links are prone to packet loss. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available