4.4 Article

Nitrogen fertilizer rate effects on weed competitiveness is species dependent

Journal

WEED SCIENCE
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages 743-747

Publisher

WEED SCI SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1614/WS-08-065.1

Keywords

competition; interference; nitrogen fertilizer; nitrogen uptake; weed management; weed nitrogen concentration

Funding

  1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada [38708019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Information on nitrogen fertilizer effects on crop-weed competitive interactions might aid in developing improved weed management programs. A controlled environment study was conducted to examine the effect of three N rates on the competitive ability of four weed species grown with wheat. The four weed species were chosen to represent species that varied in their growth responsiveness to nitrogen (N): Persian darnel (low), Russian thistle (low), redroot pigweed (high), and wild oat (high). Wheat and each weed species were grown in a replacement series design at N rates of 60, 120, and 240 mg N kg(-1) soil. The competitive ability of the low N-responsive species, Persian darnel and Russian thistle, was nor influenced by N rate, supporting our hypothesis that N rate would have little effect on the competitiveness of species responding minimally to N. Conversely, the competitiveness of the high N-responsive species redroot pigweed progressively improved as N rate increased. However, wild oat competitiveness was unaffected by N fertilizer rate. There is some evidence from this study to Suggest that fertilizer management strategies that favor crops over weeds deserve greater attention when weed infestations consist of species known to be highly responsive to higher soil N levels. Information gained in this study will be used to advise farmers of the importance of strategic fertilizer management in terms of both weed management and crop yield.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available