4.2 Article

The response of ACCase-resistant Phalaris paradoxa populations involves two different target site mutations

Journal

WEED RESEARCH
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 37-46

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2008.00677.x

Keywords

canary-grass; grass weed; acetyl-CoA carboxylase; aryloxyphenoxypropionate; carboxyl transferase; cyclohexanedione; phenylpyrazoline; target site mutation; herbicide resistance

Funding

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Israel
  2. Teomim Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phalaris paradoxa (awned canary-grass) is an aggressive annual winter weed in wheat and other arable crops that is controlled mainly by ACCase-inhibiting herbicides: cyclohexanediones (DIMs), aryloxyphenoxypropionates (FOPs) and phenylpyrazolines (DENs, e.g. pinoxaden). The selection pressure imposed on the weed populations by repeated use of these herbicides has resulted in the evolution of increased numbers of ACCase-resistant populations of P. paradoxa in Israel and other countries. Two populations, Revadim (RV) and Mishmar Ha'emek (MH) that were exposed to differing weed and crop management tactics were investigated. Both populations were highly resistant to all FOPs, pinoxaden and cycloxydim, but responded differently to some DIMs. RV plants exhibited much higher resistance to tralkoxydim than MH plants, while showing similar low levels of resistance to tepraloxydim and clethodim. Both populations were equally susceptible to graminicides with other modes of action. The mutations responsible for the observed resistance were identified using PCR-RFLP and by sequencing the carboxyl transferase domain of the chloroplastic ACCase gene. RV plants possess a substitution of Asp(2078) to Gly, whereas in MH population a mixture of Ile(2041) to Asn or Asp(2078) to Gly was found. Our study demonstrates that lack of herbicide and crop rotation may result in the evolution of diverse target site mutations and differential response of the whole plant to ACCase inhibitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available