4.7 Article

Low wear metal sliding electrical contacts at high current density

Journal

WEAR
Volume 274, Issue -, Pages 229-237

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2011.09.003

Keywords

Sliding electrical contacts; Wear; Friction; Hydrofluoroether; Copper

Funding

  1. Mersen Co.
  2. Office of Naval Research (ONR) [N00014-09-1-0584]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Operation of a low wear (2 x 10(-5) mm(3)/(N-m)), low contact resistance copper sliding electrical contact was demonstrated. The wear rate of a lightly loaded copper-beryllium metal fiber sliding on a polished copper counterface was insensitive to (DC) current density values as great as 440 A/cm(2) (in a brush positive or anodic configuration). Low wear and relatively low friction (mu similar to 0.2 to 0.3) was achieved by operating the contact immersed in a liquid medium consisting of a hydrofluoroether with helium cover gas, inhibitingoxidationand providing cooling of the contact. Similar experiments performed in liquid mediums of ultrapure water and dilute (3%) hydrogen peroxide show an order of magnitude increase in wear rate and provide further insight on the role of electrochemically enhanced oxidation and the degraded contact resistance and tribological behavior of non-noble sliding electrical contacts in general. In contrast to high current density slidingin hydrofluoroether, an order of magnitude greater wear rate was observed for similar sliding conditionsin hydrogen peroxide or water without the aid of externally supplied electric potential. A conceptual model is proposed correlatingthe rate of brush wear to fatigue strength and electrochemically enhanced oxidation as a result of high current density transport through the contact. A mathematical expression was derived to calculate the approximate wear volume of a single fiber laterally contacting a slip-ring, based on direct measurement of the wear scar geometry. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available