4.7 Article

Copper-beryllium metal fiber brushes in high current density sliding electrical contacts

Journal

WEAR
Volume 268, Issue 11-12, Pages 1230-1236

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.01.014

Keywords

Metal fiber brushes; Sliding electrical contacts; Copper-beryllium; Wear of metals

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research [N00014-09-1-0584]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of copper-beryllium (UNS C17200) was demonstrated as a low wear, highly compliant material for the construction of high current density metal fiber brushes. Testing was conducted in a humidified carbon dioxide environment. Brush linear wear rates of 4 x 10(-11) m/m were achieved at sliding speeds and current densities as high as 7.5 m/s and 215 A/cm(2) (2 MA/m(2)). Contact resistance values were on the order of 10 m Omega and friction coefficients varied from 0.30 at 2.5 m/s to 0.15 at 7.5 m/s. Characterization of the brush and slip-ring surfaces using SEM as well as the slip-ring subsurface using TEM is presented as evidence in favor of fatigue dominated wear of the copper-beryllium fiber tips. Debris flakes were observed forming on the fiber tips with characteristic widths in the range 10-100 mu m and thickness on the order of 1 mu m, in stark contrast to 1-10 mu m wide flakes of thickness on the order of 1 mu m observed forming on the slip-ring surface. Relatively clean contact resistance data at the end of the test is indicative of the robustness of the brush design and the ability of the fiber tips to remain in contact with the evolving slip-ring surface. The importance of material selection, particularly in regard to fatigue and yield strength, is highlighted in this work as key factors in improving brush design and understanding the wear phenomena observed in high current density sliding electrical contacts. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available