4.7 Article

Experimental assessment of droplet impact erosion resistance of steam turbine blade materials

Journal

WEAR
Volume 267, Issue 9-10, Pages 1605-1618

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2009.06.012

Keywords

Erosion; Droplet impact; Steel; Titanium; Laser hardening; Steam turbine

Funding

  1. federal state Baden-Wuerttemberg
  2. Siemens AG, Energy Sector [KW21]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The droplet impact erosion resistance of five different but highly relevant steam turbine blade materials is investigated with the help of an erosion test rig. The rig adapts wetness and droplet impact speed conditions in the last stages of condensing steam turbines in such a way that the material degradation is greatly accelerated in order to establish monotonic saturating material loss gradients-ideally within a testing time interval of 50 h. Repeatability and reproducibility of the evaluation method is ensured to facilitate the representative ranking of materials based on droplet impact erosion resistance being a key material property for durable steam turbine blade designs. Aselection of three blade steels (X20Cr13, a steel similar to X5CrNiMoCuNb 14-5, X5CrNiCuNb 16-4) and one titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) is tested and analysed. Additionally, X5CrNiCuNb 16-4 in a laser-hardened condition is investigated. Besides the influence of droplet impact speed and droplet impact angle on erosion, the generated surface jaggedness, the level of material degradation as well as the material loss gradients are discussed and utilised for further deductions. Among the high yield strength blade steels, the laser-hardened X5CrNiCuNb 16-4 exhibits the best erosion resistance while Ti6Al4V exhibits a higher erosion resistance than all the steel alloys tested. Finally, a simplified but functional model is inferred from the test data to estimate the droplet impact erosion resistance of alternative steel and titanium blade materials relative to the materials discussed in this text. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available