4.6 Article

A phase II study of vorinostat and rituximab for treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Journal

HAEMATOLOGICA
Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages 357-362

Publisher

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2014.117473

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [K12CA001727, P30CA033572] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA33572, K12CA001727, P30 CA033572, K12 CA001727] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the activity and tolerability of a regimen combining vorinostat and rituximab in patients with indolent B- cell non- Hodgkin lymphoma. A total of 28 patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/ refractory follicular, marginal zone, or mantle cell lymphoma, with 4 or less prior therapies were eligible for this open- label phase II study. Oral vorinostat 200 mg was administered twice daily on days 1- 14 along with 375 mg/ m2 of intravenous rituximab on day 1 of a 21- day cycle, continuing until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was objective response rate, with secondary end points of progression- free survival, time to progression, duration of response, safety, and tolerability. Median follow up was 25.6 months and median number of vorinostat cycles was 11.5. Overall response rate was 46% for all patients, 67% for previously untreated, and 41% for relapsed/ refractory patients. Median progression- free survival was 29.2 months for all patients, 18.8 months for previously treated patients, and not reached for untreated patients. The regimen was well tolerated over long treatment periods with the most common grade 3/ 4 adverse events being asymptomatic thrombosis, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and fatigue. The vorinostat/ rituximab combination exhibits activity in indolent B- cell non- Hodgkin lymphoma with an acceptable safety profile and durable responses. Re- treatment was effective in 2 of 3 relapsing responders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available