4.5 Article

Effect of organic compounds on nitrite accumulation during the nitrification process for coking wastewater

Journal

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 9, Pages 2096-2105

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2010.371

Keywords

coking wastewater; inhibitory effect; nitrification; nitrite accumulation; organic compounds

Funding

  1. Major Projects on Control and Rectification of Water Body Pollution of China [2008ZX07207-003, 2008ZX07208-004-1]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development [2007AA06Z327]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coking wastewater is one of the most toxic industrial effluents since it contains high concentrations of ammonia and toxic organic compounds. Nitrification might be upset by the inhibitory effect of organic compounds during the biological treatment of the wastewater. In this study, shortcut nitrification was obtained in a sequencing batch bioreactor (SBR) and the inhibitory effect of organic compounds on the nitrification was examined when temperature was 30 +/- 1 degrees C, pH was 7.0-8.5, and dissolved oxygen concentration was 2.0-3.0 mgL(-1). The inhibitory effect of organic compounds was presumed to be one of the main factors to obtain satisfactory nitrite accumulation. The effect of organic compounds on nitrification was examined in the SBR with initial inhibitor concentrations ranging from 0 to 80 mgL(-1), including phenol, pyrocatechol, resorcin, benzene, quinoline, pyridine and indole. The inhibitory effect became stronger with the increase in the concentration, and it was presumed to take place through a direct mechanism resulting from biological toxicity of the inhibitor itself. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect on ammonia oxidation was slighter than that on nitrite oxidation, and the nitrite accumulation ratio during the nitrification was determined by the difference between the reaction rates of above two processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available