Interflow Is Not Binary: A Continuous Shallow Perched Layer Does Not Imply Continuous Connectivity

Hillslopes exert critical controls on the quality and quantity of downstream waters. To understand and model dominant headwater catchment processes, we need to estimate the relative importance of different runoff generation processes. In this work we analyze published data from studies of 17 hillslopes from a range of landscapes to better understand the relative role of interflow, that is, shallow lateral subsurface flow moving over a layer impeding percolation, in streamflow generation. For each slope, we calculated downslope interflow travel distances, that is, the potential distance a water parcel travels downslope above an impeding layer until it percolates into the impeding layer. The downslope travel distances for the 17 hillslopes ranged from around 1 m to several hundred meters. The vector analysis of downslope travel distances revealed that all but three hillslopes had slope lengths that were much longer than downslope travel distances. For the remaining 14 cases we could show that most water perched above a shallow impeding layer percolates through the impeding layer before reaching the valley or the stream channel. Thus, interflow usually contributes directly to valley water or streamflow only from the lower portions of the hillslope in most landscapes. A critical finding of our analysis is that a continuously perched saturated zone with downslope flow does not imply continuous connectivity to the stream. Such a continuous connectivity is the exception rather than the rule in most landscapes. Future hillslope and headwater processes and modeling studies will need to account for this.