Journal
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages 2536-2551Publisher
AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/wrcr.20193
Keywords
threshold behavior; granitic catchment; infiltration into bedrock; bedrock depression storage; interflow; bedrock flow; Zhuhai
Categories
Funding
- National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [40571027]
- Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [9251027501000021]
- Innovation and Application Research Fund of the Water Sciences Department of Guangdong Province
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In general, preferential flow occurring in forest catchments cannot be reasonably described using classical partial differential equations. As a result, linear or nonlinear reservoir models are widely used in hillslope and catchment hydrology. Currently, few studies have simulated the hydrological threshold behavior that has been observed in many experimental catchments. In this study, five models with different structures were constructed using linear reservoir method to explore the inherent mechanisms of threshold behavior and to analyze the uncertainty of model structure in threshold simulations. According to the model results, the average bedrock depression storage over the study catchment (0.99 km(2)), which can be represented using the height of the lowest lateral outlet from the reservoir bottom (h(1)), was 1.5-5.1 mm. Substantial movable water percolated into the fissure bedrock and was discharged into the streamflow as base flow after storm events, illustrating why the slope of the linear relationships between the total event precipitation plus the antecedent soil moisture index (P+ASI) and the event quick flow depth above the rising threshold was less than one. Streamflow was simulated effectively by all five models with (h(1)>0) or without (h(1)=0) bedrock depression storage; however, different ratios of annual infiltration into bedrock to annual interflow discharged to the stream were obtained by models with h(1)>0 (2.5-2.8) and h(1)=0 (1.8-1.9). Namely, the calculated infiltration into bedrock was larger by models with h(1)>0 than that by models with h(1)=0. At the storm event scale, the simulated total bedrock flow was larger than the interflow for models with h(1)>0 by a ratio of 1:0.7, whereas for models with h(1)=0 the ratio was approximate to 1:1.5.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available