4.8 Article

Coupling of a bioelectrochemical system for p-nitrophenol removal in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages 11-18

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.003

Keywords

Bioelectrochemical system (BES); Organic carbon flux; p-Nitrophenol (PNP); Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51208258, 51378261]
  2. Major Project of Water Pollution Control and Management Technology of P.R. China [2012ZX07101-003-001]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2011717]
  4. Zijin Intelligent Program of NUST [2013-ZJ-02-19]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of China [51222812]
  6. Recruitment Program of Global Experts

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coupling of a bioelectrochemical system (BES) into the upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) was developed for enhanced p-nitrophenol (PNP) removal in this study. Compared to the control UASB reactor, both PNP removal and the formation of its final reductive product p-aminophenol (PAP) were notably improved in the UASB-BES system. With the increase of current density from 0 to 4.71 A m(-3), the rates of PNP removal and PAP formation increased from 6.16 +/- 0.11 and 4.21 +/- 0.29 to 6.77 +/- 0.00 and 6.11 +/- 0.28 mol m(-3) d(-1), respectively. More importantly, the required dosage of organic cosubstrate was significantly reduced in the UASB BES system than that in the UASB reactor. Organic carbon flux analysis suggested that biogas production from organic cosubstrate was seriously suppressed while direct anaerobic reduction of PNP was not remarkably affected by current input in the UASB-BES system. This study demonstrated that the UASB-BES coupling system had a promising potential for the removal of nitrophenol-containing wastewaters especially without adequate organic cosubstrates inside. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available