4.8 Article

N-doped porous carbon with magnetic particles formed in situ for enhanced Cr(VI) removal

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 12, Pages 4188-4197

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.10.056

Keywords

Cr(VI) removal; Chromium toxicity; Kinetic parameter; N-doped; Carbon; Magnetic separation

Funding

  1. Morgan Crucible Company
  2. National Science Foundation of China [51072117, 51171110]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB619600]
  4. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [0JC1407600]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A newly designed N-doped porous carbon with magnetic nanoparticles formed in situ (RHC-mag-CN) was fabricated through simple impregnation then polymerization and calcination. The doped nitrogen in RHC-mag-CN was in the form of graphite-type layers with the composition of CN. The resultant nanocomposite maintained a high surface area of 1136 m(2) g(-1) with 18.5 wt% magnetic nanoparticles (Fe3O4 and Fe) inside, which showed a saturation magnetization (Ms) of 22 emu/g. When used as an adsorbent, the RHC-mag-CN demonstrated a very quick adsorption property for the removal of Cr(VI), during which 92% of Cr(VI) could be removed within 10 min for dilute solutions at 2 g L-1 adsorbent dose. The high adsorption capacity (16 mg g(-1)) is related to the synergetic effects of physical adsorption from the surface area and chemical adsorption from complexation reactions between Cr(VI) and Fe3O4. Importantly, the basic CNs in RHC-mag-CN increase its negative charge density and simultaneously increase the adsorption of metallic cations, such as Cr3+ formed in the acid solution from the reduction of Cr(VI). The formation of magnetic nanoparticles inside not only supplies complexing sites for the adsorption of Cr(VI), but also shows perfect magnetic separation performance from aqueous solution. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available