4.8 Article

A mathematical model for removal of human pathogenic viruses and bacteria by slow sand filtration under variable operational conditions

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 7, Pages 2592-2602

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.02.027

Keywords

Slow sand filtration model; Bacteriophage MS2; Escherichia coli

Funding

  1. BTO [B111691]
  2. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Slow sand filtration (SSF) in drinking water production removes pathogenic microorganisms, but detection limits and variable operational conditions complicate assessment of removal efficiency. Therefore, a model was developed to predict removal of human pathogenic viruses and bacteria as a function of the operational conditions. Pilot plant experiments were conducted, in which bacteriophage MS2 and Escherichia coli WR1 were seeded as model microorganisms for pathogenic viruses and bacteria onto the filters under various temperatures, flow rates, grain sizes and ages of the Schmutzdecke. Removal of MS2 was 0.082-3.3 log(10) and that of E. coli WR1 0.94-4.5 log(10) by attachment to the sand grains and additionally by processes in the Schmutzdecke. The contribution of the Schmutzdecke to the removal of MS2 and E. coli WR1 increased with its ageing, with sticking efficiency and temperature, decreased with grain size, and was modelled as a logistic growth function with scale factor f(0) and rate coefficient f(1). Sticking efficiencies were found to be microorganism and filter specific, but the values of f(0) and f(1) were independent of microorganism and filter. Cross-validation showed that the model can be used to predict log removal of MS2 and ECWR1 within +/- 0.610g. Within the range of operational conditions, the model shows that removal of microorganisms is most sensitive to changes in temperature and age of the Schmutzdecke. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available