4.8 Article

High diversity and differential persistence of fecal Bacteroidales population spiked into freshwater microcosm

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 247-257

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.004

Keywords

Bacteroidales population; Persistence; Diversity; Fecal pollution; Freshwater; Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis

Funding

  1. South Florida Water Management District [4600001774]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacteroidales markers are promising indicators of fecal pollution and are now widely used in microbial source tracking (MST) studies. However, a thorough understanding of the persistence of Bacteroidales population after being released into environmental waters is lacking. We investigated the persistence of two host specific markers (HF183 and CF193) and temporal change of Bacteroidales population over 14 days in freshwater microcosms seeded with human or bovine feces. The concentrations of HF183/CF193 and Escherichia coli were determined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and standard cultivation method, respectively. Shifts in the Bacteroidales population structure were fingerprinted using PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and subsequent sequencing analysis targeting both 16S rDNA and rRNA-transcribed cDNA. Both HF183 and CF193 decayed significantly faster than E. coli but the decay curves fit poorly with first-order model. High diversity of Bacteroidales population was observed for both microcosms, and persistence of different species in the population varied. Sequence analysis indicated that most of the bovine Bacteroidales populations in our study are unexplored. DGGE and decay curve indicated that RNA decayed faster than DNA, further supporting the use of rRNA as indicator of metabolically active Bacteroidales population. Evaluations with more realistic scenarios are warranted prior to extending the results of this study to real field settings. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available