4.8 Article

Preparation and characterisation of new-polyaluminum chloride-chitosan composite coagulant

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 46, Issue 15, Pages 4614-4620

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.06.021

Keywords

Coagulation; NOM; Composite PACl; Mechanism; Speciation

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [LP100100481]
  2. DCM Process control
  3. Water Corporation
  4. Australian Research Council [LP100100481] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the formulation of a novel polyaluminum chloride-chitosan composite coagulant that improves the coagulation process for natural organic matter (NOM) removal was investigated. The performance of the composite coagulant was tested using two water sources (synthetic and natural water) to develop a better understanding on the behaviour of the composite coagulant. Fourier Transform-Infra red (FT-IR) spectroscopy, ferron analysis and zeta potential studies were performed to characterise the composite coagulant. FT-IR analysis showed that there is an intermolecular interaction between Al species and chitosan molecules, while ferron analysis indicated that the distributions of Al-a, Al-b, and Al-c in PACl-chitosan are different from those in PACl. At a low Al dosage (2.16 mg L-1), a much higher removal of NOM from synthetic water, as evidenced from UV254 and Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) measurements, was achieved by the composite coagulants in comparison to that removed by PACl or PACl and chitosan added separately. For natural water from the Myponga Reservoir, both polyaluminum chloride (PACl) and PACl-chitosan composite coagulants demonstrated similar dissolved organic carbon (DOC) percentage removal, whereas PACl-chitosan gave a slight improvement in removing the UV254 absorbing components of NOM. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available