4.8 Article

The effect of pH on N2O production under aerobic conditions in a partial nitritation system

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 18, Pages 5934-5944

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.055

Keywords

Nitrous oxide; pH; Anaerobic digester liquor; Ammonia-oxidising bacteria; Partial nitritation; Wastewater treatment; Sequencing batch reactor; Greenhouse gas emissions

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC)
  2. Western Australian Water Corporation [LP0991765, DPO0987204]
  3. Australian Postgraduate Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ammonia-oxidising bacteria (AOB) are a major contributor to nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions during nitrogen transformation. N2O production was observed under both anoxic and aerobic conditions in a lab-scale partial nitritation system operated as a sequencing batch reactor (SBR). The system achieved 55 +/- 5% conversion of the 1 g NH4+-N/L contained in a synthetic anaerobic digester liquor to nitrite. The N2O emission factor was 1.0 +/- 0.1% of the ammonium converted. pH was shown to have a major impact on the N2O production rate of the AOB enriched culture. In the investigated pH range of 6.0-8.5, the specific N2O production was the lowest between pH 6.0 and 7.0 at a rate of 0.15 +/- 0.01 mg N2O-N/h/g VSS, but increased with pH to a maximum of 0.53 +/- 0.04 mg N2O-N/h/g VSS at pH 8.0. The same trend was also observed for the specific ammonium oxidation rate (AOR) with the maximum AOR reached at pH 8.0. A linear relationship between the N2O production rate and AOR was observed suggesting that increased ammonium oxidation activity may have promoted N2O production. The N2O production rate was constant across free ammonia (FA) and free nitrous acid (FNA) concentrations of 5-78 mg NH3-N/L and 0.15-4.6 mg HNO2-N/L, respectively, indicating that the observed pH effect was not due to changes in FA or FNA concentrations. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available