4.8 Article

Structure of nitrifying biofilms in a high-rate trickling filter designed for potable water pre-treatment

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 11, Pages 3489-3498

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.04.017

Keywords

Nitrification; Trickling filter; FISH; Scanning electron microscopy; Organic carbon; Biological water treatment; Carbohydrate; Protein; Heterotrophs; Ammonia; Multi-species biofilm

Funding

  1. Thames Water [gs1]
  2. United Water International

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the composition and structure of nitrifying biofilms sampled from a high-rate nitrifying trickling filter which was designed to pre-treat raw surface water for potable supply. The filter was operated under a range of feed water ammonia and organic carbon concentrations that mimicked the raw water quality of poorly protected catchments. The biofilm structure was examined using a combination of fluorescence in situ hybridisation and scanning electron microscopy. Biopolymers (carbohydrate and protein) were also measured. When the filter was operated under low organic loads, nitrifiers were abundant, representing the majority of microorganisms present. Uniquely, the study identified not only Nitrospira but also the less common Nitrobacter. Small increases in organic carbon promoted the rapid growth of filamentous heterotrophs, as well as the production of large amounts of polysaccharide. Stratification of nitrifiers and heterotrophs, and high polysaccharide were observed at all filter bed depths, which coincided with the impediment of nitrification throughout most of the filter bed. Observations presented here specifically linked biofilm structure with filter functionality, physically validating previous empirical modelling hypotheses regarding competitive interactions between autotrophic and heterotrophic bacteria in biofilms. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available