4.8 Article

Assessment of human adenovirus removal in a full-scale membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages 1520-1530

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.10.039

Keywords

MBR; Adenovirus; Removal; PCR; Quantitative

Funding

  1. Center for Water Sciences at the Michigan State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human adenoviruses (HAdVs) in wastewater samples taken from four different treatment stages of a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant (i.e., incoming raw sewage, primary sedimentation effluent, membrane bioreactor (MBR) influent, and MBR effluent) were quantified by real-time PCR assays to further estimate removal efficiency of the HAdVs. Based on hexon gene sequence comparisons, HAdv species A, C, and F were consistently found in the wastewater samples. In general, all three identified HAdV species were detected in most of the wastewater samples using the real-time PCR assays. Overall HAdV concentrations were rather stable over the entire 8-month study period (January-August, 2008) (approximately 106-107 viral particles/L of wastewater for the raw sewage and primary effluent; 10(8)-10(9) viral particles/L for the MBR influent; and, 10(3)-10(4) viral particles/L for the MBR effluent). No significant seasonal differences were noticed for the HAdV abundances. Removal efficiencies of the viral particles in the full-scale MBR process were assessed and showed an average HAdV removal of 5.0 +/- 0.6 logs over the study period. The removal efficiencies for F species (average log removal of 6.5 +/- 1.3 logs) were typically higher ( p-value <0.05) than those of the other two species (average of 4.1 +/- 0.9 and 4.6 +/- 0.5 logs for species A and C, respectively). These results demonstrate that the full-scale MBR system efficiently removed most HAdV from the wastewater leaving about 10(3) viral particles/L in the MBR effluent. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available