4.8 Article

Preparation and evaluation of iron-chitosan composites for removal of As(III) and As(V) from arsenic contaminated real life groundwater

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 15, Pages 3862-3870

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.05.040

Keywords

Chitosan; Arsenic; Removal; Adsorption; Groundwater

Funding

  1. Department of science and Technology, New Delhi [DST/TDT/WTI/2KT/22]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study on the removal of arsenic from real life groundwater using iron-chitosan composites is presented. Removal of arsenic(III) and arsenic( was studied through adsorption at pH 7.0 under equilibrium and dynamic conditions. The equilibrium data were fitted to Langmuir adsorption models and the various model parameters were evaluated. The monolayer adsorption capacity from the Langmuir model for iron chitosan flakes (ICF) (22.47 +/- 0.56 mg/g for As(V) and 16.15 +/- 0.32 mg/g for As(III)) was found to be considerably higher than that obtained for iron chitosan granules (ICB) (2.24 +/- 0.04 mg/g for As(V); 2.32 +/- 0.05 mg/g for As(III)). Anions including sulfate, phosphate and silicate at the levels present in groundwater did not cause serious interference in the adsorption behavior of arsenate/arsenite. The column regeneration studies were carried out for two sorption-desorption cycles for both As(III) and As(V) using ICF and ICB as sorbents. One hundred and forty-seven bed volumes of As(III) and 112 bed volumes of As(V) spiked groundwater were treated in column experiments using ICB, reducing arsenic concentration from 500 to <10 mu g/l. The eluent used for the regeneration of the spent sorbent was 0.1 M NaOH. The adsorbent was also successfully applied for the removal of total inorganic arsenic down to <10 mu g/l from real life arsenic contaminated groundwater samples. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available