4.8 Article

Whole lake selective withdrawal experiment to control harmful cyanobacteria in an urban impoundment

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 1187-1198

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.007

Keywords

Aphanizomenon; Microcystis; Microcystin; N:P ratios; Phycocyanin; Lake management

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. EPA STAR [R830653-010]
  3. USDA [2006-02523]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different environmental conditions support optimal growth by Aphanizomenon and Microcystis in Ford Lake, Michigan, USA, based on weekly species biovolume and water chemistry measurements from June through October 2005-2007. Experimental withdrawal of hypolimnetic water through the outlet dam was conducted in 2006, with 2005 and 2007 acting as control years, to test theory regarding management of nuisance and toxic cyanobacteria. The dynamics of Aphanizomenon and Microcystis blooms in Ford Lake appear to be driven largely by NO3- concentrations, with higher levels shifting the advantage to Microcystis (P < 0.0001). Aphanizomenon was most successful with a mean TN:TP ratio (mol:mol) of 48.3:1, whereas Microcystis thrived with a mean ratio of 70.1:1. Withdrawal of hypolimnetic water successfully destabilized the water column and led to higher levels of NO3- and the near elimination of the Aphanizomenon bloom in 2006 (P < 0.0001). Selective withdrawal did not reduce Microcystis biovolume or microcystin toxicity. Microcystis biovolume and NO3- levels were positively correlated with microcystin toxin (P = 0.01) and jointly accounted for 30.5% of the variability in the data. Selective withdrawal may be a viable management option for improving water quality under certain circumstances. To fully address the problem of nuisance and toxic algal blooms in Ford Lake, however, an integrated approach is required that targets cyanobacteria biovolume dynamics as well as conditions suited for toxin production. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available