4.8 Review

The impact of algal properties and pre-oxidation on solid-liquid separation of algae

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 8-9, Pages 1827-1845

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.11.039

Keywords

algae; coagulation; filtration; flotation; sedimentation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Algae are traditionally classified according to biological descriptors which do not give information on surface characteristics that are important with respect to removal by water treatment processes. This review examines the character of freshwater algal populations from a water treatment perspective and evaluates the impact of their varying properties and the use of pre-oxidation on their removal by solid-liquid separation processes.. The characteristics shown to impact on treatment were morphology, motility, surface charge, cell density and the extracellular organic matter (EOM) composition and concentration. With the exception of density, these are not phyla specific. It was also shown that dissolved air flotation (DAF) was the most robust clarification method, where up to 99.8% removal was achieved compared to 94% for sedimentation when using metal coagulants. However, successful clarification relied heavily on the optimisation of preceding coagulation and flocculation and coagulant demand was important in this respect. Comparison of all available data reveals a relationship between cell surface area and coagulant demand. It is thus suggested that cell surface area would provide a basis for regrouping algae such that the classification is informative with respect to water treatment. However, the absolute coagulant demand is a result of both surface area and EOM influences. The latter are relatively poorly understood in comparison to natural organic matter (NOM) systems and this remains a limit in current knowledge. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available