4.8 Article

Protein extraction from activated sludge:: An analytical approach

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 8-9, Pages 1867-1878

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.11.011

Keywords

activated sludge; BCA method; modified Lowry method; EPS; extraction methods; protease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate the efficiency of different methods on exopolymeric substance (EPS) extraction, mechanical and chemical treatments were applied on two activated sludges, regarding the yield of protein extraction as well as their compatibility with usual quantification methods. Mechanical disruption methods do not drastically affect protein measurements by both bicinchoninic acid (BCA) and modified Lowry methods. Chemical compounds such as cationic exchange resin and triton show high interference with modified Lowry method while the protein quantification by BCA method is not affected. In addition, inner sludge compounds were shown to interfere with both methods: BCA and modified Lowry measurement respectively overestimate and underestimate protein content. According to these data, BCA method was chosen in this study as the most appropriate protein quantification method in sludge extracts. Comparison of various extraction protocols, combining mechanical and/or chemical treatments, shows that efficiency can be increased by repeating the same method or by applying a prior mechanical treatment. Proteins are preferably extracted by triton treatments, indicating the importance of hydrophobic interactions linking proteins to the EPS matrix. The amount of extracted proteins reaches 182 and 148mgeq. BSAg-1VSS using triton/triton and ultraturax/triton extractions, respectively Protease activity/extracted protein ratios vary widely depending on extraction protocols. Protease seemed to be preferably extracted by ultrasound and triton treatments (150-220 U mg(-1) protein). This study underlines that the choice of a relevant coupled quantification/extraction method is of great importance for efficient EPS determination. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available