4.0 Review

Fish tainting in the Alberta oil sands region: a review of current knowledge

Journal

WATER QUALITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF CANADA
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 1-13

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wqrjc.2012.027

Keywords

Athabasca region; end pit lakes (EPL); fish tainting; oil sands processed waters (OSPW)

Funding

  1. Canadian Oil Sands Network for Research and Development: Albian Sands Inc.
  2. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
  3. Imperial Oil Resources Limited
  4. Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc.
  5. Suncor Energy Inc.
  6. Syncrude Canada Ltd
  7. Total EP Canada Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Athabasca oil sands in northeastern Alberta, Canada represent the second largest petroleum reserve in the world. The process of extracting bitumen from the oil sands uses huge volumes of water, drawn from sources in the Athabasca River basin, and numerous mining companies operate adjacent to the river. Oil sands process-affected water (OSPW) from open pit mining is placed in large settling basins or tailings ponds that have the potential to leak. The goal is to eventually reclaim the tailings ponds to become functional ecosystems. Natural outcrops of oil sands in contact with surface waters also occur, and there are anecdotal reports in the media that fish caught near the Athabasca oil sands have an unusual flavor or odor. Several analytical and sensory studies have been undertaken to address this issue. Two major questions related to fish tainting arise: (1) Do the current oil sands mining, extraction and upgrading processes cause fish tainting in surrounding waters? (2) What is the tainting potential for fish that become established in reclaimed waters in the future? This review examines the types of compounds in OSPW that might contribute to tainting and the sensory science literature available related to fish tainting and the oil sands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available