4.6 Article

Effect of aeration rate on nutrient removal from slaughterhouse wastewater in intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactors

Journal

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
Volume 192, Issue 1-4, Pages 251-261

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-008-9652-9

Keywords

aeration rate; intermittent aeration; nutrient removal; slaughterhouse wastewater; sequencing batch reactor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of aeration rate on nutrient removal from slaughterhouse wastewater was examined in two 10-L laboratory-scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs-SBR1 and SBR2) operated at ambient temperature. The contaminants in the slaughterhouse wastewater had average concentrations of 4,000 mg chemical oxygen demand (COD) L(-1), 350 mg total nitrogen (TN) L(-1) and 26 mg total phosphorus (TP) L(-1). The duration of a complete SBR operation cycle was 8 h and comprised four operational phases: fill (7 min), react (393 min), settle (30 min) and draw/idle (50 min). During the react phase, the reactors were intermittently aerated four times at 50-min intervals, 50 min each time. DO, pH and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) in the reactors were real-time monitored. Four aeration rates-0.2 L air min(-1) in SBR1 for 70 days, 0.4 L air min(-1) in SBR1 for 50 days, 0.8 L air min(-1) in SBR2 for 120 days and 1.2 L air min(-1) in SBR1 for 110 days-were tested. When the aeration rate was 0.2 L air min(-1), the SBR was continuously anaerobic. When the aeration rate was 0.4 L air min(-1), COD and TP removals were 90% but TN removal was only 34%. When the aeration rates were 0.8 and 1.2 L air min(-1), average effluent concentrations were 115 mg COD L(-1), 19 mg TN L(-1) and 0.7 mg TP L(-1), giving COD, TN and TP removals of 97%, 95% and 97%, respectively. It was found that partial nitrification followed by denitrification occurred in the intermittently aerated SBR systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available