4.5 Article

Valorization of poly(lactic acid) wastes via mechanical recycling: Improvement of the properties of the recycled polymer

Journal

WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 135-141

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0734242X18798448

Keywords

Poly(lactic acid); mechanical recycling; packaging materials waste; waste valorization; thermal properties; mechanical properties

Funding

  1. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness -Spain [CTM2017-88989-P]
  2. Universidad Politecnica de Madrid [UPM RP 160543006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is a biobased polymer that represents one of the most interesting alternatives to fossil-fuel based polymers in food packaging applications. Most of the PLA used in food packaging is used only once and then discarded, even though the PLA types used in packaging have good properties and stability. Therefore, it seems reasonable to consider the possibility of recycling the used polymer through a mechanical recycling process. The main aims of this work are to study the effect of the mechanical recycling on the properties of PLA and the usefulness of different upgrading methods to obtain recycled PLA with improved properties. A commercial type of PLA was subjected to accelerated thermal, photochemical and hydrolytic aging and then reprocessed. During reprocessing, aged PLA was blended with virgin PLA and a commercial chain extender was added. Results point out that recycling causes the degradation of PLA, and negatively affects the thermal stability and mechanical properties. However, addition of virgin PLA, and the chain extender, led to an increase of up to 9% in the intrinsic viscosity and 8% in the Vickers hardness of the recycled material. These results suggest that mechanically recycled PLA with improved performance can be obtained, a fact which might improve the recyclability of PLA and thus the environmental impact of this material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available