4.7 Article

Evaluation of batch anaerobic co-digestion of palm pressed fiber and cattle manure under mesophilic conditions

Journal

WASTE MANAGEMENT
Volume 34, Issue 11, Pages 1984-1991

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.07.015

Keywords

Anaerobic co-digestion; Biogas production; Cattle manure; Kinetic model; Palm pressed fiber

Funding

  1. National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China during the 12th Five-Year Plan Period [2012BAD47B02, 2012BAD14B03]
  2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomass-based Energy and Enzyme Technology [JSBEET1221]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Palm pressed fiber (PPF) and cattle manure (CM) are the waste which can be managed properly by anaerobic co-digestion. The biogas production in co-digested PPF and CM at three volatile solids (VS) ratios of 3:1, 1:1, and 1:3 was investigated in a series of batch experiments at an organic loading rate of 30.0 g VS/L under mesophilic (37 +/- 1 degrees C) conditions. The highest daily biogas yield of PPF and CM only, was 90.0 mL/g VSadded at day 12 and 23.4 mL/g VSadded at day 7. For co-digestion of PPF/CM at mixing ratios of 3:1, 1:1 and 1:3, there were 93.6 mL/g VSadded at day 11, 86.8 and 26.4 mL/g VSadded at day 8. VS removal rate for PPF, CM, and co-digestion at mixing ratio of 3:1, 1:1, and 1:3 were 91.1%, 86.0% and 71.0%, respectively. The anaerobic digestion of PPF and CM and their co-digestion systems were stable in operation with low range of volatile fatty acids (VFA)/TIC (total inorganic carbon) of (0.035-0.091). The main volatile fatty acids were propionic, and iso-butyric acids for PPF, iso-butyric and n-butyric acids for CM. The VFAs and ammonium inhibition were not occurred. The modified Gompertz model can be used to perform a better prediction with a lower difference between the measured and predicted biogas yields. A VS ratio of 3:1 is recommended for practice. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available