4.7 Article

Utilization of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash for sulfoaluminate cement clinker production

Journal

WASTE MANAGEMENT
Volume 31, Issue 9-10, Pages 2001-2008

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.04.022

Keywords

MSWI fly ash; Sulfoaluminate; Clinker; Free expansion; Leaching test

Funding

  1. National High-tech R&D Program (863 Program) of China [2006AA06Z363]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20090072110010]
  3. Tongji University, Shanghai, China [2009KJ005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The feasibility of partially substituting raw materials with municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) fly ash in sulfoaluminate cement (SAC) clinker production was investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), compressive strength and free expansion ratio testing. Three different leaching tests were used to assess the environmental impact of the produced material. Experimental results show that the replacement of MSWI fly ash could be taken up to 30% in the raw mixes. The good quality SAC clinkers are obtained by controlling the compositional parameters at alkalinity modulus (C-m) around 1.05, alumina-sulfur ratio (P) around 2.5, alumina-silica ratio (N) around 2.0 similar to 3.0 and firing the raw mixes at 1250 degrees C for 2 h. The compressive strengths of SAC are high in early age while that develop slowly in later age. Results also show that the expansive properties of SAC are strongly depended on the gypsum content. Leaching studies of toxic elements in the hydrated SAC-based system reveal that all the investigated elements are well bounded in the clinker minerals or immobilized by the hydration products. Although some limited positive results indicate that the SAC prepared from MSWI fly ash would present no immediate thread to the environment, the long-term toxicity leaching behavior needs to be further studied. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available