4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Automated sampling and control of gaseous simulations

Journal

VISUAL COMPUTER
Volume 29, Issue 6-8, Pages 751-760

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-013-0798-0

Keywords

Eulerian simulation; Simulation control; Poisson disk sampling; Bilateral sampling

Funding

  1. NSF [IIS-0917286]
  2. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [KUS-CI-016-04]
  3. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [0917286] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we describe a method that automates the sampling and control of gaseous fluid simulations. Several recent approaches have provided techniques for artists to generate high-resolution simulations based on a low-resolution simulation. However, often in applications the overall flow in the low-resolution simulation that an animator observes and intends to preserve is composed of even lower frequencies than the low resolution itself. In such cases, attempting to match the low-resolution simulation precisely is unnecessarily restrictive. We propose a new sampling technique to efficiently capture the overall flow of a fluid simulation, at the scale of user's choice, in such a way that the sampled information is sufficient to represent what is virtually perceived and no more. Thus, by applying control based on the sampled data, we ensure that in the resulting high-resolution simulation, the overall flow is matched to the low-resolution simulation and the fine details on the high resolution are preserved. The samples we obtain have both spatial and temporal continuity that allows smooth keyframe matching and direct manipulation of visible elements such as smoke density through temporal blending of samples. We demonstrate that a user can easily configure a simulation with our system to achieve desired results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available