4.3 Article

Investigation of bistable perception with the silhouette spinner: Sit still, spin the dancer with your will

Journal

VISION RESEARCH
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages 34-39

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.03.005

Keywords

Bistable motion perception; Intention; Voluntary control; Biological plausibility; Active perception

Funding

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [99-2410-H-008-022-MY3, 100-2511-S-008-019, 97-2631-S-008-008-MY5, 96-2413-H-008-001, 97-2511-S-008-005-MY3, 98-2517-S-004-001-MY3, 98-2918-I-008-011]
  2. Fulbright Scholarship, Taiwan and USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many studies have used static and non-biologically related stimuli to investigate bistable perception and found that the percept is usually dominated by their intrinsic nature with some influence of voluntary control from the viewer. Here we used a dynamic stimulus of a rotating human body, the silhouette spinner illusion, to investigate how the viewers' intentions may affect their percepts. In two experiments, we manipulated observer intention (active or passive), fixation position (body or feet), and spinning velocity (fast, medium, or slow). Our results showed that the normalized alternating rate between two bistable percepts was greater when (1) participants actively attempted to switch percepts, (2) when participants fixated at the spinner's feet rather than the body, inducing as many as 25 switches of the bistable percepts within 1 min, and (3) when they watched the spinner at high velocity. These results suggest that a dynamic biologically-bistable percept can be quickly alternated by the viewers' intention. Furthermore, the higher alternating rate in the feet condition compared to the body condition suggests a role for biological meaningfulness in determining bistable percepts, where 'biologically plausible' interpretations are favored by the visual system. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available