4.5 Article

Assembly and immunological properties of a bivalent virus-like particle (VLP) for avian influenza and Newcastle disease

Journal

VIRUS RESEARCH
Volume 178, Issue 2, Pages 430-436

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2013.09.009

Keywords

Avian influenza virus; Newcastle disease virus; Chimeric virus-like particles; Immune response

Categories

Funding

  1. Chinese National High-tech R&D Program (863 Program) [2011AA10A209]
  2. Cooperative Project in Industry, Education and Research of Guangdong Province
  3. Ministry of Education of People's Republic of China [2010B090301019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Avian influenza virus (AIV) and Newcastle disease virus (NDV) are both important pathogens in poultry worldwide. The protection of poultry from avian influenza and Newcastle disease can be achieved through vaccination. We embarked on the development of a bivalent vaccine that would allow for a single immunization against both avian influenza and Newcastle disease. We constructed a chimeric virus-like particle (VLP) that is composed of the M1 protein and HA protein of avian influenza virus and a chimeric protein containing the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains of AIV neuraminidase protein (NA) and the ectodomain of the NDV hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) protein (NA/HN). The single immunization of chickens with the chimeric VLP vaccine induced both AIV H5- and NDV-specific antibodies. The HI titers and specific antibodies elicited by the chimeric VLPs were statistically similar to those elicited in animals vaccinated with the corresponding commercial monovalent vaccines. Chickens vaccinated with chimeric VLP vaccine and then challenged with the Newcastle disease F48E9 virus displayed complete protection. Overall, the chimeric VLP vaccine elicits strong immunity and can protect against Newcastle disease virus challenge. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available