4.3 Article

Galectin-1 (GAL-1) expression is a useful tool to differentiate between small cell osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma

Journal

VIRCHOWS ARCHIV
Volume 462, Issue 6, Pages 665-671

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-013-1423-3

Keywords

ESFT; GAL-1; Immunohistochemistry; Osteosarcoma; Chondrosarcoma

Categories

Funding

  1. EuroBoNet: European Network to Promote Research into uncommon cancer in adults and children [018814]
  2. Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Galectin-1 (GAL-1) is frequently expressed in osteosarcomas. Although a valuable diagnostic marker to differentiate between chondroblastic osteosarcomas and conventional chondrosarcomas, it has not been tested in the Ewing sarcoma family of tumors (ESFTs). We studied by immunohistochemistry GAL-1 expression in 43 osteosarcomas, 23 chondrosarcomas, and 217 genetically confirmed ESFTs using a tissue microarray. GAL-1 was expressed in 78 % of osteosarcomas, 33 % of chondrosarcomas, and 8 % of ESFTs. Osteoblastic and small cell osteosarcoma subtypes expressed GAL-1 in a high percentage of cells when compared with the other histological subtypes, whereas two chondroblastic osteosarcomas were negative. GAL-1 was mainly expressed in high-grade chondrosarcomas (grade III). ESFTs were rarely positive (8 %), and this was not related to the histological subtype nor to the clinical outcome. Although GAL-1 expression distinguishes chondroblastic osteosarcomas from conventional chondrosarcomas and is usually negative in conventional chondrosarcomas, the final diagnosis needs to incorporate histopathology since some chondroblastic osteosarcomas fail to express GAL-1, while high-grade chondrosarcomas are GAL-1 positive. Since GAL-1 is frequently expressed in osteogenic tumors, including small cell osteosarcoma, but rarely positive in ESFTs, its expression seems a valuable tool for distinguishing between these lesions. GAL-1 immunoexpression is not indicative of prognosis in ESFT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available