4.2 Article

No effect of delay on the spatial representation of serial reach targets

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 233, Issue 4, Pages 1225-1235

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4197-9

Keywords

Gaze-centered spatial updating; Memory delay; Reaching; Egocentric; Allocentric; Reference frame

Categories

Funding

  1. International Research Training Group (IRTG) [1901]
  2. German Research Foundation [DFG Fi1567/2-2]
  3. Alexander-von-Humboldt Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When reaching for remembered target locations, it has been argued that the brain primarily relies on egocentric metrics and especially target position relative to gaze when reaches are immediate, but that the visuo-motor system relies stronger on allocentric (i.e., object-centered) metrics when a reach is delayed. However, previous reports from our group have shown that reaches to single remembered targets are represented relative to gaze, even when static visual landmarks are available and reaches are delayed by up to 12 s. Based on previous findings which showed a stronger contribution of allocentric coding in serial reach planning, the present study aimed to determine whether delay influences the use of a gaze-dependent reference frame when reaching to two remembered targets in a sequence after a delay of 0, 5 or 12 s. Gaze was varied relative to the first and second target and shifted away from the target before each reach. We found that participants used egocentric and allocentric reference frames in combination with a stronger reliance on allocentric information regardless of whether reaches were executed immediately or after a delay. Our results suggest that the relative contributions of egocentric and allocentric reference frames for spatial coding and updating of sequential reach targets do not change with a memory delay between target presentation and reaching.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available