4.3 Article

Claudins 1, 3, and 4 protein expression in ER negative breast cancer correlates with markers of the basal phenotype

Journal

VIRCHOWS ARCHIV
Volume 454, Issue 6, Pages 647-656

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-009-0770-6

Keywords

Claudin 1, 3, 4; Tissue microarray; Invasive breast cancer; Basal-like subtype; Immunohistochemistry; Estrogen receptor

Categories

Funding

  1. Manitoba Health Research Council (MHRC)
  2. CancerCare Manitoba Foundation (CCMF)
  3. Manitoba Graduate Scholarship
  4. Manitoba Health Research Council
  5. Manitoba Medical Service Foundation
  6. Health Sciences Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study we investigated the protein expression of claudins 1, 3, and 4 and their relationship to clinical variables and outcome in a cohort of ER-ve and ER+ve human invasive breast cancers. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on tissue microarrays representing a total of 412 tumors and interpretable data was derived from 314, 299, and 306 tumors for claudins 1, 3, and 4, respectively. In the ER+ve subset, 5%, 89%, and 52%, and in the ER-ve subset, 39%, 79%, and 79% of tumors stained positively for claudins 1, 3, and 4, respectively (p < 0.0001, p = 0.026, p < 0.0001). Thus, in the two subsets, a significantly higher number of tumors were positive for claudins 3 and 4, compared to claudin 1. In addition, protein expressions of claudins 1 and 4 were significantly higher in those tumors that displayed characteristics of the basal-like subtype of breast cancers (ER-ve, Her-2-ve, EGFR+ve, CK5/6+ve). This study shows a unique pattern of expression for the different claudins in ER-ve and ER+ve tumors. Our data also suggests that increased expression of claudins 1 and 4 was associated with the basal-like subtype of breast cancers, a subtype generally linked to poor outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available