4.3 Article

Prognostic implications of CpG island hypermethylator phenotype in colorectal cancers

Journal

VIRCHOWS ARCHIV
Volume 455, Issue 6, Pages 485-494

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-009-0857-0

Keywords

Colon cancer; CpG island methylator phenotype; DNA methylation; Microsatellite instability

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science & Technology in Korea [FG09-11-02]
  2. National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [0720540]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) refers to a subset of colorectal cancers (CRCs) that are characterized by concordant hypermethylation of multiple CpG island loci. CIMP+ CRCs have peculiar clinicopathological features. However, controversy exists over prognostic implications of CIMP in CRCs. We analyzed 320 cases of CRCs for their CIMP status using the MethyLight assay and determined clinicopathological features and prognostic implications of CIMP alone or in combination with microsatellite instability (MSI). With methylation of five or more markers among eight markers examined, CIMP+ tumors were significantly associated with female gender, proximal tumor location, poor differentiation, nodal metastasis, more advanced cancer, BRAF mutations, MSI, and poor prognosis (all P values < 0.05). Ogino's combined eight-marker panel outperformed the Ogino and the Laird five-marker panels in detecting these features. Of the four molecular subtypes generated by the combination of CIMP and MSI status, the CIMP+/MSI- subtype showed the worst clinical outcome (P = 0.0003). However, poor prognosis of CIMP+/MSI- subtype was found to be attributed to BRAF mutation. In conclusion, the CIMP+/MSI- subtype tends to present with distinct clinicopathological and molecular features and shows the worst clinical outcome among the four molecular subtypes of CRCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available