4.3 Article

Clinical significance of nuclear factor (NF)-κB levels in urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder

Journal

VIRCHOWS ARCHIV
Volume 452, Issue 3, Pages 295-304

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-007-0560-y

Keywords

NF kappa B; immunoexpression; bladder urothelial carcinoma

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B has been reported to be constitutively activated in various human neoplasms. However, its clinical significance in bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC) remains an unresolved issue. We conducted this study trying to elucidate the role of NF kappa B in bladder UC and its potential prognostic significance, by quantifying immunohistochemically the levels of p65/RelA expression in paraffin-embedded tissue from 116 patients. Some of the cases had previously been stained for cellular FLICE-like inhibitory protein (c-FLIP) and bcl-2. Seventy-four cases displayed concurrent cytoplasmic and nuclear immunoreactivity, whereas 18 only nuclear immunoexpression and 21 only cytoplasmic immunoexpression, and the remaining three cases were negative for p65/RelA. Nuclear p65/RelA expression was positively associated with tumour grade and T-category (p=0.0001 in both cases). In addition, cytoplasmic p65/RelA expression was lower in advanced T-category (p=0.0030). Moreover, p65/RelA nuclear expression was positively correlated with c-FLIP (p=0.0109) and bcl-2 (p=0.0452). p65/RelA nuclear expression adversely affected survival in both univariate and multivariate analysis in superficial (Ta-T1; p=0.0010 and p=0.0008) as well as in muscle-invasive carcinomas (T2-T4; p=0.0004 and p = 0.0003). Our results demonstrate that NF-kappa B nuclear expression is correlated with histologic grade and T category in bladder UC. Moreover, NF-kappa B nuclear expression emerges as an independent prognosticator of adverse significance, conveying information beyond that obtained by standard clinicopathological prognosticators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available