4.2 Article

Tilted frames of reference have similar effects on the perception of gravitational vertical and the planning of vertical saccadic eye movements

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 233, Issue 7, Pages 2115-2125

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4282-0

Keywords

Perception; Saccades; Gravity; Vertical; Frames of reference

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [093280/Z/10/Z]
  2. Wellcome Trust [093280/Z/10/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the effects of a tilted reference frame (i.e., allocentric visual context) on the perception of the gravitational vertical and saccadic eye movements along a planned egocentric vertical path. Participants (n = 5) in a darkened room fixated a point in the center of a circle on an LCD display and decided which of two sequentially presented dots was closer to the unmarked '6 o'clock' position on that circle (i.e., straight down toward their feet). The slope of their perceptual psychometric functions showed that participants were able to locate which dot was nearer the vertical with a precision of 1A degrees aEuro2A degrees. For three of the participants, a square frame centered at fixation and tilted (in the roll direction) 5.6A degrees from the vertical caused a strong perceptual bias, manifest as a shift in the psychometric function, in the direction of the traditional 'rod-and-frame' effect, without affecting precision. The other two participants showed negligible or no equivalent biases. The same subjects participated in the saccade version of the task, in which they were instructed to shift their gaze to the 6 o'clock position as soon as the central fixation point disappeared. The participants who showed perceptual biases showed biases of similar magnitude in their saccadic endpoints, with a strong correlation between perceptual and saccadic biases across all subjects. Tilting of the head 5.6A degrees reduced both perceptual and saccadic biases in all but one observer, who developed a strong saccadic bias. Otherwise, the overall pattern and significant correlations between results remained the same. We conclude that our observers' saccades-to-vertical were dominated by perceptual input, which outweighed any gravitational or head-centered input.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available