4.8 Article

DNA methylation in Arabidopsis has a genetic basis and shows evidence of local adaptation

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.05255

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) [P50HG002790]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [268962]
  3. European Commission Marie Curie FP7 fellowship [253524]
  4. European Commission European Community Framework Programme 7 [283496]
  5. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [GM07464]
  6. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [M1369]
  7. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [M1369] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [268962] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epigenome modulation potentially provides a mechanism for organisms to adapt, within and between generations. However, neither the extent to which this occurs, nor the mechanisms involved are known. Here we investigate DNA methylation variation in Swedish Arabidopsis thaliana accessions grown at two different temperatures. Environmental effects were limited to transposons, where CHH methylation was found to increase with temperature. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) revealed that the extensive CHH methylation variation was strongly associated with genetic variants in both cis and trans, including a major trans-association close to the DNA methyltransferase CMT2. Unlike CHH methylation, CpG gene body methylation (GBM) was not affected by growth temperature, but was instead correlated with the latitude of origin. Accessions from colder regions had higher levels of GBM for a significant fraction of the genome, and this was associated with increased transcription for the genes affected. GWAS revealed that this effect was largely due to trans-acting loci, many of which showed evidence of local adaptation. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.05255.001

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available