4.8 Article

G-actin provides substrate-specificity to eukaryotic initiation factor 2α holophosphatases

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.04871

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [084812/Z/08/Z, 082961/Z/07/Z]
  2. UK Medical Research Council [G1002610]
  3. European Commission (EU FP7) [277713]
  4. Wellcome Trust Strategic Award for core facilities to the Cambridge Institute for Medical Research [100140]
  5. MRC [G0601840, G1002610] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. British Lung Foundation [APHD11-4] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G0601840, G1002610] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Wellcome Trust [084812/Z/08/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dephosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2a (eIF2a) restores protein synthesis at the waning of stress responses and requires a PP1 catalytic subunit and a regulatory subunit, PPP1R15A/GADD34 or PPP1R15B/CReP. Surprisingly, PPP1R15 PP1 binary complexes reconstituted in vitro lacked substrate selectivity. However, selectivity was restored by crude cell lysate or purified G-actin, which joined PPP1R15- PP1 to form a stable ternary complex. In crystal structures of the non-selective PPP1R15B-PP1G complex, the functional core of PPP1R15 made multiple surface contacts with PP1G, but at a distance from the active site, whereas in the substrate selective ternary complex, actin contributes to one face of a platform encompassing the active site. Computational docking of the N-terminal lobe of elF2a at this platform placed phosphorylated serine 51 near the active site. Mutagenesis of predicted surface-contacting residues enfeebled dephosphorylation, suggesting that avidity for the substrate plays an important role in imparting specificity on the PPP1R15B-PP1G actin ternary complex.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available