4.4 Article

Chlorine Radical Doping of a Few Layer Graphene with Low Damage

Journal

ECS JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages N5095-N5097

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0141506jss

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NanocircleMaterial Technology Development Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012M3A7B4035323]
  2. Industrial Strategic technology development program - Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE, Korea) [10041926]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10041926] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012M3A7B4035324] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a graphene plasma doping method using chlorine radicals generated in an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) with a double mesh grid system. Raman spectroscopy and sheet resistance measurement showed that this doping method is non-destructive and controllable approach for the p-type graphene layer doping method. And, by using a chlorine trap-doping method, the sheet resistance could be decreased to 76% at an optimized condition for the tri-layer graphene. (C) The Author(s) 2015. Published by ECS. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License (CC BY-NC-ND, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is not changed in any way and is properly cited. For permission for commercial reuse, please email: oa@electrochem.org. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available