Journal
ECOSPHERE
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages -Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/ES15-00001.1
Keywords
Bayesian; carnivore; mountain lion; non-invasive; population estimation; Puma concolor; SCR
Categories
Funding
- Ravalli County Fish and Wildlife Association
- Montana Outdoor Legacy Foundation
- Western Montana Chapter of the Safari Club International
- Safari Club International Foundation
- Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
- University of Montana
- U.S.D.A. Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service Grant [MONZ-1106]
- sale of hunting and fishing licenses in Montana and Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration grants
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Wildlife managers need reliable methods to estimate large carnivore densities and population trends; yet large carnivores are elusive, difficult to detect, and occur at low densities making traditional approaches intractable. Recent advances in spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models have provided new approaches for monitoring trends in wildlife abundance and these methods are particularly applicable to large carnivores. We applied SCR models in a Bayesian framework to estimate mountain lion densities in the Bitterroot Mountains of west central Montana. We incorporate an existing resource selection function (RSF) as a density covariate to account for heterogeneity in habitat use across the study area and include data collected from harvested lions. We identify individuals through DNA samples collected by (1) biopsy darting mountain lions detected in systematic surveys of the study area, (2) opportunistically collecting hair and scat samples, and (3) sampling all harvested mountain lions. We included 80 DNA samples collected from 62 individuals in the analysis. Including information on predicted habitat use as a covariate on the distribution of activity centers reduced the median estimated density by 44%, the standard deviation by 7%, and the width of 95% credible intervals by 10% as compared to standard SCR models. Within the two management units of interest, we estimated a median mountain lion density of 4.5 mountain lions/100 km 2 (95% CI = 2.9, 7.7) and 5.2 mountain lions/100 km(2) (95% CI = 3.4, 9.1). Including harvested individuals (dead recovery) did not create a significant bias in the detection process by introducing individuals that could not be detected after removal. However, the dead recovery component of the model did have a substantial effect on results by increasing sample size. The ability to account for heterogeneity in habitat use provides a useful extension to SCR models, and will enhance the ability of wildlife managers to reliably and economically estimate density of wildlife populations, particularly large carnivores.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available