4.2 Article

Chronic ocular lesions associated with bi-directional microbeam radiation therapy in an experimental rat study for therapy of C6 and F98 gliomas

Journal

VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 290-298

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2008.00649.x

Keywords

cataract; electroretinography; microbeam radiation therapy (MRT); retinopathy; synchrotron

Funding

  1. Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation (SHRF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To describe the chronic ocular lesions associated with microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) in an experimental rat study. Procedures MRT was administered bi-directionally with a skin entry dose of 350 Gy. During laterally directed irradiation, the beam entered the head on the right with the center of the beam array 3 mm posterior to the center of the right eye. During irradiation in anterior-posterior direction, the right eye was almost completely in the path of the beam array. Twelve months after MRT ophthalmic examinations were completed on 37 treated (MRT+) and 16 control (MRT-) rats. Electroretinography (ERG) was completed in two MRT+ and one MRT- rat. Histopathology was performed on eyes of 16 MRT+ and 9 MRT- rats, and retinal and choroidal thicknesses were measured. Results Biomicroscopic and indirect ophthalmoscopic examinations revealed fundus pallor and retinal vascular attenuation in 33 of 37 right and 2 of 37 left eyes of MRT+ rats. Cataracts were present in the right eyes of 12 of 37 MRT+ rats. ERG amplitudes were reduced in the eyes of MRT+ rats. Light microscopy revealed retinal lesions ranging in severity with loss of outer to inner retinal cell layers, in 16 of 16 right and of 8 of 16 left eyes MRT+ rats. The mean right retinal thickness of MRT+ rats was reduced. Conclusions Eyes within the field treated with MRT at a dose of 350 Gy develop retinal degeneration and occasionally, cataract.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available