4.2 Article

Modulation of matrix metalloproteinases by ultraviolet radiation in the canine cornea

Journal

VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 135-144

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2008.00575.x

Keywords

chronic superficial keratitis; cornea; EGFR; matrix metalloproteinases; p38 MAPK; ultraviolet radiation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To determine whether ultraviolet (UV) radiation can modulate expression and regulation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) in the canine cornea and to examine the expression of MMPs in canine chronic superficial keratitis (CSK). Methods lmmunohistochemistry for MMP-2 and MMP-9 was performed on samples of CSK. In vitro, canine corneal epithelial cell (CEC) and stromal cell cultures were exposed to UV-irradiation. Following 2, 8 or 24 h, cells were harvested. AIMP expression was examined by zymography, and RT-PCR was used to examine expression of Slug and Snail. CEC cultures treated with an EGFR inhibitor or a p38 inhibitor were UV-exposed and harvested 24 h later to examine expression of MMPs, Slug and Snail. Results Canine CSK had increased immunopositivity for both MMP-2 and MMP-9 compared to normal canine corneas. In vitro, CEC and stromal cell cultures exposed to UV showed generally increased expression of MMP-2, -9, Slug, and Snail; this response was dose and time dependent. Inhibition of the EGFR pathway did not prevent increased expression of MMP-2, -9, Slug or Snail in UV-exposed CEC; however, p3 8 inhibition did attenuate UV induction. Conclusions We have found increased expression of MMPs in clinical samples of CSK compared to normal corneas. In addition, we have shown that there is a temporal association and dose dependency between T-TV exposure and production of MMP's, Slug, and Snail. These findings suggest that overexpression of MMPs due to UV-exposure may be linked to changes in the cornea that allow an influx of inflammatory cells and vascularization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available